Two out of three voting solenoid arrangement

ABSTRACT

A binary voting solenoid arrangement  10  is provided which operates in a “2 out of 3” manner to provide relatively high safety, low spurious tripping and a relatively low installation cost, while also enabling on-line testing of each solenoid individually without process interruption. Solenoid arrangements  10, 10 ′ and  10 ″ are preferably used in a three-way configuration, while solenoid  10 ′″ may be used in a two-way configuration.

RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application is CIP to commonly assigned U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/638,311, entitled Two Out Of Three Voting Solenoid Arrangement, filed Aug. 14, 2000 (now abandoned), which was a Continuation of commonly assigned U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/233,406 (now U.S. Pat. No. 6,155,282), entitled Two Out Of Three Voting Solenoid Arrangement, filed Jan. 19, 1999.

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

1. Field of the Invention

This invention relates to solenoid valves, and more particularly to an arrangement of solenoid valves in instrumentation and process control systems of a plant.

2. Background Information

Modem process or manufacturing plants contain innumerable operating components. These components are tied together to form systems controlled by instrumentation and control systems containing sensors and controllers. The instrumentation and control systems on such plants not only serve to control the functions of the various components in order to achieve the desired process conditions, but they also provide the facility to safely modify or discontinue the operation of all or a portion of the plant's systems in order to avoid an unsafe situation or condition.

Safety systems or configurations require routine testing in order to verify that they continue to properly perform the functions for which they were intended. From an operational and economic point of view, they also should not modify or discontinue the operation of the plant system unnecessarily. One of the means by which such safety systems function is by the securing or diverting of the supply of a certain process fluid or the supply of motive power to a plant system or component of a plant system.

One of the means by which these safety functions may be accomplished is through the use of solenoid operated valves. In operation, the solenoid valves of such systems serve to isolate and/or vent off the fluid or pneumatic source from the system when the solenoid valve changes state or position (e.g. when the valve is de-energized by switches or process monitoring sensors coupled thereto). The plant system and any system controlled thereby is then placed in a configuration designated for safety.

In many cases, the operation of individual solenoid valves may not be tested without actually tripping the system and undesirably modifying or discontinuing the operation of the plant system. Moreover, various configurations available for actuating safety shutoff valves generally require a trade-off between competing characteristics of safety and spurious trip rate.

For example, a “1 out of 2” voting solenoid valve arrangement generates a process modification (i.e. shutdown) when at least one of the two solenoids changes state. Such a configuration provides relatively high safety, with an associated relatively high spurious trip rate (i.e., a single faulty valve or sensor may generate a false trip).

A “2 out of 2” voting solenoid valve arrangement requires actuation of two solenoid valves in order to trigger a modification of the plant system. This configuration has a relatively low spurious trip rate, since both solenoids must fail or otherwise change state to generate a spurious trip. However, the solenoid valves of this arrangement must be tested frequently to insure safety, since failure of only a single solenoid valve may effectively prevent the system from shutting down, etc.

Quad voting solenoids provide a balance of safety and reliability, however the quad configuration utilizes four solenoids in a relatively complex arrangement that tends to be difficult to install, test, and maintain.

Thus, there exists a need for a voting solenoid configuration which combines the features of relatively high safety with relatively low spurious trip rate and does not require the plant system to be shut down during testing.

SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

According to an embodiment of this invention, a voting solenoid arrangement is adapted to selectively couple a fluid supply with a fluid receiver, the voting solenoid arrangement including first, second and third solenoid valves disposed in fluid communication with one another, each of the solenoid valves being alternately actuatable between first and second states so that a change of state of any two of the solenoid valves is adapted to alternately couple and de-couple the fluid supply with the fluid receiver.

Another aspect of the present invention includes a method for selectively coupling a fluid supply with a fluid receiver, the method comprising the steps of providing first, second and third solenoid valves each being alternately actuatable between first and second states; and disposing the solenoid valves in fluid communication with one another so that a change of state of any two of the solenoid valves is adapted to alternately couple and de-couple the fluid supply with the fluid receiver.

According to still another aspect, this invention includes a two way valve including a voting solenoid arrangement adapted to selectively couple a fluid input with a fluid output, the voting solenoid arrangement including first, second and third solenoid valves disposed in fluid communication with one another, each of the solenoid valves being alternately actuatable between first and second states so that a change of state of any two of the solenoid valves is adapted to alternately couple and de-couple the fluid input with the fluid output.

According to yet another aspect, this invention includes a method for fabricating a two-way valve for selectively coupling a fluid input with a fluid output, the method including providing first, second and third solenoid valves, each being alternately actuatable between first and second states, and disposing the solenoid valves in fluid communication with one another such that a change of state of at least any two of the solenoid valves is adapted to alternately couple and de-couple the fluid input with the fluid output.

The above and other features and advantages of this invention will be more readily apparent from a reading of the following detailed description of various aspects of the invention taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

FIG. 1 is a schematic circuit diagram of a fluid safety system incorporating the solenoid arrangement of the present invention;

FIG. 2 is a truth table for individual actuation of the solenoids of the solenoid arrangement of FIG. 1;

FIG. 3 is a view similar to FIG. 1, of an alternate embodiment of the present invention;

FIG. 4 is a view similar to FIG. 2, of the alternate embodiment of FIG. 3;

FIG. 5 is a schematic circuit diagram of another alternate embodiment of the present invention;

FIG. 6 is a block diagram showing the solenoid arrangements of the present invention employed in (A) a three-way configuration and (B) a two-way configuration; and

FIG. 7 is a schematic circuit diagram of an alternate embodiment of the present invention designed to be employed in a two-way configuration;

DETAILED DESCRIPTION

Referring to the figures set forth in the accompanying Drawings, the illustrative embodiments of the present invention will be described in detail hereinbelow. For clarity of exposition, like features shown in the accompanying Drawings shall be indicated with like reference numerals and similar features as shown in alternate embodiments in the Drawings shall be indicated with similar reference numerals.

Referring to FIGS. 1-4, the apparatus constructed according to the principles of the present invention is shown. The present invention includes a voting solenoid arrangement 10 which operates in a “2 out of 3” manner to provide relatively high safety, low spurious tripping and a relatively low installation cost, while also enabling on-line testing of each solenoid individually without process interruption. Solenoid arrangement 10 is preferably manifolded (not shown), to facilitate maintenance on any detected failure, and to simplify installation and replacement.

Referring now to FIG. 1, the apparatus of the present invention will be more thoroughly described. As shown, the voting solenoid arrangement 10 of the present invention is adapted to selectively channel air from an air supply 12 ultimately to a valve or other fluid receiver 14. Valve 14 may be a component of a plant process, instrumentation or control system. Any suitable fluid may be utilized, such as hydraulic fluid, water, etc. In a preferred embodiment, the solenoid arrangement 10 is pneumatic. The fluid is fed from air supply 12 to solenoid arrangement 10 through conduit 16 and subsequently flows from solenoid arrangement 10 to valve 14 through conduit 18. Voting solenoid arrangement 10 includes three discreet solenoid valves 20, 22 and 24, any two of which must be actuated to start or stop air flow from conduit 16 to conduit 18. As shown, in a preferred embodiment, solenoid valves 20, 22 and 24 are bidirectional 5-port 4-way solenoid valves. These valves are thus operable with fluid flowing therethrough in either of two directions along one of two pairs of alternate pathways. For example, valve 20 includes a pair of common ports 202 and 204 which are selectively and alternately coupled with a distinct two of three other ports by alternate fluid pathways 26 and 27. As shown, in a first state (i.e., energized), pathways 26 of valve 20 couple ports 202 and 204 to ports 201 and 205. When actuated to its second (i.e. de-energized) state, pathways 27 (shown in phantom) couple the common ports 202 and 204 with ports 201 and 203. Fluid communication or coupling operation of the pathways 26 and 27 are mutually exclusive, so that when pathways 26 are open, pathways 27 are closed and vice versa.

Conduit 16 supplies air simultaneously to port 201 of valve 20 and to port 225 of solenoid valve 22. When the valves 20, 22 and 24 are in their normal or energized states, the passageways 26 are open and passageways 27 are closed. Alternatively, when the valves are disposed in their de-energized states, passageways 26 are closed and the alternate passageways 27 are open. When the valves are in their normal state air will flow from conduit 16 through port 201 of valve 20 to port 202 and to conduit 28 which in turn supplies the air to port 221 of valve 22. The air then travels through the valve 22 to port 222 and on through conduit 30 to port 241 of valve 24. Simultaneously, air from conduit 16 is fed to conduit 32, to port 225 of valve 22, through the valve to port 224, then to port 245 of valve 24 through conduit 34. The solenoid valve 24 then passes the air to port 244, to conduit 18 and ultimately to valve 14.

In the event of a change of state of any single valve 20, 22 or 24, such as in the event of a valve failure or a valve test, air will continue to pass through the solenoid arrangement 10 to the valve 14. For example, in the event solenoid valve 24 is de-energized, although air flowing through the valve from conduit 34 will be shut off, passageways 27 will open to permit air from conduit 30 to be fed from port 241 to port 244, and thus to conduit 18, to maintain air flow to valve 14. Air will only cease flowing to conduit 18 in the event one of the other solenoid valves 20 or 22 is also de-energized. In this regard, if valve 22 is de-energized in addition to valve 24, air being fed to the valve 22 at port 221 would flow to port 224 (instead of port 222) and thus through conduit 34 to port 245 of the valve 24. Since valve 24 is de-energized, passageway 26 thereof is closed and accordingly, air does not flow to conduit 18. Similarly, if both valves 20 and 24 are de-energized, air that would otherwise flow to port 241 of valve 24 from valve 22, is effectively shutoff at valve 20 due to the closing of the passageway 26 between ports 201 and 202 thereof.

In the event that only valve 22 is de-energized, air supply arriving at port 225 through conduit 32 at port 225 is effectively shut off. However, air being supplied by conduit 28 to port 221 will be shunted to port 224 and thus through conduit 34 to port 245 of valve 24, where it will be fed through the valve to conduit 18. In the event that both valve 22 and valve 20 are de-energized, the air flow to valve 22 through conduit 28 will be effectively shut off by the action of valve 20 which when de-energized, shunts the air supply at port 201 to port 204.

As also shown, a series of pressure valves 40, 42 and 44 are provided to monitor the actual state of solenoid valves 20, 22 and 24. In a preferred embodiment, pressure switch 40 is disposed in pressure sensing contact with port 204 of solenoid valve 20. Pressure switch 42 is disposed in pressure sensing contact with conduit 30 and pressure switch 44 is disposed in pressure sensing contact with port 242 of valve 24. The pressure switches 42 and 44 include electrical contacts (not shown) which are alternately open and closed in response to absence and presence of pressure thereat (i.e.normally open). Pressure switch 40 includes electrical contacts (not shown) which are alternately closed and opened in response to absence and presence of pressure thereat (i.e. normally closed).

In the embodiment shown, when only solenoid valve 20 is de-energized, air pressure from port 201 is shunted to port 204 which serves to open the contacts of switch 40. Simultaneously, the contacts of pressure switches 42 and 44 are opened due to lack of pressure thereat. Upon reset or energization of solenoid valve 20, the contacts of pressure switches 40, 42 and 44 return to their closed states. When only solenoid valve 22 fails or otherwise toggles to its de-energized state, pressure switches 42 and 44 sense a decrease in pressure and open their contacts. Upon reset of solenoid valve 22, the contacts of pressure switches 42 and 44 return to their closed states. When only solenoid valve 24 fails or is otherwise de-energized, pressure switch 44 registers a reduction in pressure to open the contacts thereof Upon reset of solenoid valve 24, the contacts of pressure switch 44 return to a closed state. This operation of pressure switches 40, 42 and 44 is shown in the truth table of FIG. 2.

The contacts of pressure switches 40, 42 and 44 may be connected to suitable circuitry such as, for example, a programmable logic controller (PLC) which may be programmed using the truth table of FIG. 2 in a manner familiar to those skilled in the art, to verify operation of each individual solenoid valve 20, 22 and 24 during testing thereof The present invention thus advantageously enables each solenoid valve to be tested independently without disrupting fluid flow to valve 14. In this manner, the solenoid arrangement 10 may be tested frequently without disrupting plant process operation for increased safety relative to prior art configurations. In addition, safety is enhanced by effecting a cessation of fluid flow to valve 14 upon de-energization of less than a full complement of the solenoid valves 20, 22 and 24, i.e., air flow is abated once any two of the three valves changes state. This effectively permits solenoid arrangement 10 to safely stop air flow even in the event one of the valves 20, 22 and 24 fails in its energized state and becomes non-operational. Such safety is achieved while advantageously providing the low spurious trip rate typically associated with conventional 2 out of 3voting solenoid arrangements by requiring two solenoids to change state before terminating fluid flow.

As also shown in FIG. 1 a stack selector valve including valves 50 and 52 may be used to bypass the solenoid arrangement 10 for maintenance and/or replacement thereof. As shown, valve 50 is disposed between fluid supply 12 and conduit 16 to selectively divert fluid flow from conduit 16 to a pressure switch 54. Valve 52 is connected to fluid or air supply 12 upstream of valve 50, and is coupled to both conduit 18 and to valve 14 for selectively coupling air supply 12 directly to valve 14 while bypassing voting solenoid arrangement 10. Where used herein “upstream” and “downstream” refer to the fluid flow direction relative to components of the present invention. For example, the term “upstream”, when referring to a component, refers to a direction counter to the direction of fluid flow into or through the component, while “downstream” refers to the direction of fluid flow through the component. Valves 50 and 52 of the stack selector valve are operable in tandem with one another between a normal position in which air flows from supply 12, through valve 50 to conduit 16, and from conduit 18 through valve 52 to valve 14 as shown, and a bypass position as shown in phantom. In the bypass position, air flow bypasses solenoid arrangement 10 and also supplies pressure to pressure switch 54, which serves to change the state of (i.e. open) the contacts thereof Pressure switch 54 is preferably connected to monitoring and/or control circuitry such as the PLC discussed hereinabove to facilitate monitoring the position of valves 50 and 52.

As shown and described herein, solenoid valves 20, 22 and 24 are preferably disposed in their energized states during normal fluid flow through passageway 26 thereof to valve 14. This generally provides increased safety, since any interruption in power to the solenoid valves will tend to generate a change in state of the valves to stop fluid flow to valve 14. However, these solenoid valves may be disposed in their de-energized state during normal fluid flow therethrough, without departing from the spirit and scope of the present invention. Similarly, although the contacts of pressure switches 42 and 44 are preferably disposed in their open states and pressure switch 40 in the closed state when solenoid valves 20, 22 and 24 are de-energized, any, or all of these contacts may be disposed in their closed or open states when the valves are de-energized, without departing from the spirit and scope of the present invention.

As also shown, in a preferred embodiment, ports 203 and 205 of valve 20, port 223 of valve 22, and port 243 of valve 24 are vented. However, these ports may be coupled to a fluid recovery system, such as in the event fluid other than air, (i.e. hydraulic fluid), is used, without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention.

Referring now to FIGS. 3 and 4 an alternate embodiment of the present invention is shown as voting solenoid arrangement 10′. It is in many respects substantially similar or identical to solenoid arrangement 10. As shown, solenoid arrangement 10′ includes solenoid valves 20 and 22 including pressure switches 40 and 42 disposed substantially as shown and described hereinabove with respect to solenoid arrangement 10. Solenoid valve 24′ is substantially identical to solenoid valve 24 of FIG. 1, however as shown, valve 24′ is disposed in a reverse configuration relative to valve 24. In this embodiment, conduits 30 and 34 are respectively coupled to ports 244 and 242. Similarly, pressure switch 44 and conduit 18 are respectively coupled to ports 243 and 241. In addition, rather than one of the ports (i.e. port 243 of valve 24) being vented, port 245 is plugged to prevent discharge of fluid during normal fluid flow. In this embodiment, the contacts of pressure switch 44 remain in a first state (i.e. closed) as long as solenoid valve 24′ is disposed in its energized state as shown. Pressure switch 44 changes state only when solenoid valve 24′ is de-energized while solenoid valves 20 and 22 remain energized. In such an event, fluid flowing through conduit 34 will be coupled to the pressure switch 44 to thereby change or open its contacts. A truth table showing the state of pressure switches 40, 42 and 44 during individual de-energization of solenoid valves 20, 22 and 24′ is shown in FIG. 4. Stack selector valve including valves 50 and 52, is disposed and operated substantially as described hereinabove with respect to solenoid arrangement 10. In addition as shown, an optional pressure switch 56 may be coupled between valve 52 and valve 14 to monitor and verify flow of fluid therebetween.

The voting solenoid arrangements 10 and 10′ of the present invention including the stack selector valve formed by valves 50, 52 and pressure switch 54, may be implemented in any convenient manner. For example the components thereof may be coupled to one another as shown and described herein, using suitable conduit or channel means such as tubing fabricated from a flexible polymeric material, or from a metallic, material such as steel, copper, etc. In a preferred embodiment, the solenoid valves of the present invention are disposed within a unitary manifold (not shown), which incorporates the fluid flow paths therein. The stack selector valve including valves 50 and 52 may also be disposed within the manifold if desired. Use of such a manifold, with the fluid pathways or conduits integrally disposed therein, advantageously serves to reduce installation and maintenance cost relative to the non-manifolded arrangements.

Referring now to FIG. 5, another alternate embodiment of the present invention is shown as voting solenoid arrangement 10″. It is in many respects substantially similar or identical to solenoid arrangement 10. As shown, solenoid arrangement 10″ includes solenoid valves 20, 22 and 24 and including pressure switches 40, 42 and 44 disposed substantially as shown and described hereinabove with respect to solenoid arrangement 10. Solenoid arrangement 10″ further includes a bi-directional five-port valve 55 in place of stack selector valves 50 and 52 (which are used in solenoid arrangement 10 and shown in FIG. 1). Valve 55 is typically included inside the manifold and functions similarly to valves 20, 22, 24 except that it is generally preferred that it be manually operatable. In this embodiment, conduits 16 and 18 are coupled to ports 264 and 262, respectively. Port 263 is coupled through conduit 38 to port 244 of solenoid valve 24. In addition, port 261 is coupled to supply 12, while port 265 is vented. Further, pressure switch 54″ is coupled to conduit 16. In the energized state valve 55 connects supply 12 to conduit 16 and port 244 of solenoid valve 24 through conduit 38 to conduit 18. In the de-energized state valve 55 connects supply 12 directly to conduit 18 and vents conduit 16, which opens pressure switch 54″. The artisan of ordinary skill will recognize that solenoid arrangement 10″ functions substantially identically to that of solenoid arrangement 10. This is further demonstrated by the truth table showing the state of pressure switches 40, 42 and 44 during individual de-energization of solenoid valves 20, 22, and 24 for solenoid arrangement 10″, which is identical to that of solenoid arrangement 10 (shown in FIG. 2).

For some commercial applications it is desirable to use the “2 out of 3” voting solenoid arrangement of the present invention in a two-way configuration rather than in a three-way configuration (solenoid arrangements 10, 10′ and 10″ are designed for a three-way configuration). Referring now to FIGS. 6A and 6B, a two-way and a three-way configuration are contrasted. As shown, each of the configurations includes an input 12 (also previously referred to as a fluid source and/or a fluid supply), a valve 14, an output 15 (shown as a vent in FIGS. 1 and 3) and a solenoid arrangement, referred to as 10A for the three-way configuration and 10B for the two-way configuration. In each configuration input 12 may be thought of as making a ‘T-type’ connection with output 15 and valve 14. As used herein, the principle difference between the two-way and three-way configurations is as follows: In a three-way configuration, the ‘T-type’ connection generally resides within solenoid arrangement 10A, which functions to selectively couple input 12 with output 15 and valve 14. Solenoid arrangement 10A couples valve 14 to input 12 (effectively blocking output 15) when energized and couples valve 14 to output 15 (blocking input 12) when de-energized. In a two-way configuration, solenoid arrangement 10B generally resides between the ‘T-type’ connection and output 15. Solenoid arrangement 10B functions essentially as a two-way valve that selectively opens and closes upon actuation. When energized it closes the connection to output 15 (i.e. interrupts fluid communication between input 12 and output 15) allowing input 12 to pressurize valve 14. When de-energized it opens the connection to output 15 (i.e. provides for fluid communication between input 12 and output 15), effectively ‘shorting’ input 12 and releasing pressure from valve 14.

Referring now to FIG. 7, in yet another alternate embodiment, the present invention may be configured for two-way function and is shown as voting solenoid arrangement 10′″. Solenoid arrangement 10′″ is similar to the previous embodiment (solenoid arrangement 10) in that it includes three solenoids 20, 22 and 24 (preferably being of the kind having 5 ports and bi-directional flow) and pressure switches 40, 42 and 44 whose function is described hereinabove with respect to FIG. 1. Solenoid arrangement 10′″ differs from solenoid arrangement 10 in that stack selector valves 52 and 54 are eliminated. Supply 12 is connected directly to conduit 16, which is further connected to ports 201 and 225 (through conduit 32) of valves 20 and 22, respectively. Conduit 16 is still further connected (through conduit 36) to port 244 of valve 24. In this manner supply 12 is connected directly to each of the three solenoids. Further, pressure switch 54″ is coupled to conduit 16. Still further, it may be preferred for some applications for solenoid 10′″ to utilize hydraulic fluid rather than air.

Solenoid 10′″ is substantially similar to solenoid arrangement 10 in that it functions in a “2 out of 3” manner, and therefore, may provide relatively high safety, relatively low spurious tripping and a relatively low installation cost. However, having a two-way configuration, solenoid 10′″ simply de-couples supply 12 from output 15 when all three solenoid valves 20, 22 and 24 are energized. As stated above, conduit 16 simultaneously supplies fluid to valves 20, 22 and 24 at ports 201, 225 and 244, respectively. Fluid at port 201 flows through valve 20 to port 202 and then through conduit 28 to port 221 of valve 22. It then flows through valve 22 to port 222 and through conduit 30, pressurizing switch 42, to port 241 of valve 24 where it flows through to port 242 and pressurized switch 44. Fluid at port 225 flows through valve 22 to port 224 and then through conduit 34 to port 245 of valve 24 where it flows to port 244 and then through conduit 36 back to conduit 16. Fluid at port 244 of valve 24 has the opposite flow direction as that at port 225 of valve 22 described immediately above. As described, solenoid 10′″ does not provide for fluid communication between supply 12 and output 15 when solenoid valves 20, 22 and 24 are energized, and therefore may maintain the fluid pressure provided by supply 12.

In the event of a change of state of any single valve 20, 22 and 24, such as in the event of a valve failure or valve test, solenoid arrangement 10′″ continues to hold the fluid pressure provided by supply 12. For example, in the event that solenoid valve 20 is de-energized, fluid pressure at port 201 is diverted to port 204, thereby pressurizing switch 40. Port 202 is diverted to port 203, which is vented, releasing the pressure at switches 42 and 44, which are in fluid communication with port 202 (when valves 22 and 24 are energized as described above). The function of switches 40, 42 and 44 is substantially identical to that of solenoid arrangement 10. This is further demonstrated by the fact that the truth table for solenoid arrangement 10′″ is identical to that of solenoid arrangement 10 (as shown in FIG. 2). While switches 42 and 44 are vented and fluid is diverted such that it pressurizes switch 40, there is no fluid communication between supply 12 and output 15 (typically a vent or an exhaust). Solenoid arrangement 10′″, therefore, continues to hold the pressure provided by supply 12. Likewise, and in a similar manner, solenoid arrangement 10′″ holds pressure if only solenoid valve 22 or 24 are de-energized.

In the event that any two out of three or all three of solenoid valves 20, 22 or 24 are de-energized, solenoid valve 10′″ provides for fluid communication between supply 12 and output 15. For example if valves 20 and 24 are de-energized, fluid at port 244 of valve 24 is diverted to port 241 where it flows through conduit 30 to port 222 of valve 22. Fluid may then flow through valve 22 to port 221 and then through conduit 28 to port 202 of valve 20. Fluid at port 202 is diverted to port 203, which is coupled with output 15, thereby providing fluid communication between supply 12 and output 15. Likewise, and in a similar manner, fluid communication is provided between supply 12 and output 15 if any other combination of two out of three or three out three of valves 20, 22 and 24 are de-energized.

The foregoing description is intended primarily for purposes of illustration. Although the invention has been shown and described with respect to an exemplary embodiment thereof, it should be understood by those skilled in the art that the foregoing and various other changes, omissions, and additions in the form and detail thereof may be made therein without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention. 

Having thus described the invention, what is claimed is:
 1. A two-way valve including a voting solenoid arrangement adapted to selectively couple a fluid input and a fluid output, said voting solenoid arrangement comprising: first, second, and third solenoid valves each having a plurality of ports; a plurality of inlet and outlet pathways each extending from a respective port of one of said solenoid valves to a port of another of said solenoid valves, wherein said solenoid valves are disposed in fluid communication with one another; at least one port of each of said first, second, and third solenoid valves being the fluid output; at least one port of each of said first, second, and third solenoid valves being the fluid input; said first solenoid valve is coupled to said second solenoid valve discrete from said fluid input and said fluid output; said second solenoid valve is coupled to said third solenoid valve discretely from said fluid input and said fluid output; said first solenoid valve is free from coupling to said third solenoid valve discretely from said fluid input and said fluid output; each of said first, second and third solenoid valves being alternatively actuatable between first and second open and closed positions; wherein actuation of at least any two of said first, second and third solenoid valves alternately couples and decouples the fluid input with the fluid output.
 2. The two-way valve of claim 1 wherein said fluid output is a vent or drain.
 3. The two-way valve of claim 1 wherein said first, second and third solenoid valves each include five port, four way solenoid valves.
 4. The two-way valve of claim 3 wherein said five port, four way solenoid valves further comprise a pair of common ports which are selectively coupled in fluid communication with three other ports, said alternate actuation including alternately coupling said first pair of common ports with a distinct two of said three other ports.
 5. The two-way valve of claim 4 wherein: the fluid input is coupled to one of said other ports of each of said first and second solenoid valves; the fluid input is coupled to one of said pair of common ports of said third solenoid valve; each of said pair of common ports of said second solenoid valve are respectively coupled along discrete pathways with two of said three other ports of said third solenoid valve; and at least one of said other ports of each of said first, second and third solenoid valves are coupled with the fluid output.
 6. The two-way valve of claim 1 wherein said voting solenoid arrangement is configured such that any one of said first, second and third solenoid valves may be actuated without selectively coupling and de-coupling the fluid input with the fluid output.
 7. The two-way valve of claim 1 wherein said fluid comprises hydraulic fluid or air.
 8. The two-way valve of claim 1 further comprising a plurality of pressure sensors operatively associated with said first, second and third solenoid valves to indicate the state thereof.
 9. The two-way valve of claim 8 wherein said first, second and third solenoid valves are adapted for being individually tested without de-coupling the fluid input from the fluid output, said plurality of pressure sensors being adapted to indicate the state of the individual solenoid valve being tested.
 10. The two-way valve of claim 1 wherein said second solenoid valve is in fluid communication with said third solenoid valve along at least two discrete pathways.
 11. A two-way valve comprising: first, second and third solenoid valves each including at least two common ports and three other ports, wherein said at least two common ports are selectively coupled in fluid communication with a distinct two of three other ports; at least one of said other ports of each of said first and second solenoid valves being in fluid communication with a fluid input; at least one of said pair of common ports of said third solenoid valve being in fluid communication with a fluid input; at least one of said three other ports of each of said first, second and third solenoid valves being in fluid communication with a fluid output; wherein said first solenoid valve is in fluid communication with said second solenoid valve; wherein at least two of said common ports of said second solenoid valve are respectively coupled along discrete pathways with two of said three other ports of said third solenoid valve; wherein each of said first, second and third solenoid valves are alternatively actuatable between open and closed positions; and wherein actuation of at least any two of said first, second and third solenoid valves alternately couples and decouples the fluid input and fluid output of said two-way valve.
 12. A method for fabricating a two-way valve for selectively coupling a fluid input with a fluid output, the method comprising: providing first, second and third solenoid valves each having a plurality of ports, and each being alternately actuatable between open and closed positions; providing a plurality of inlet and outlet pathways each extending from a respective port of one of said solenoid valves to a port of another of said solenoid valves, wherein said solenoid valves are disposed in fluid communication with one another, the first solenoid valve being coupled to the second solenoid valve discretely from the fluid input and the fluid output, the second solenoid valve being coupled to the third solenoid valve discretely from the fluid input and the fluid output, and the first solenoid valve being free from coupling to the third solenoid valve discretely from the fluid input and the fluid output; coupling the fluid input to at least one port of each of said first, second and third solenoid valves; and coupling the fluid output to at least one port of each of said first, second and third solenoid valves; wherein actuation of any two of said first, second and third solenoid valves alternately couples and de-couples the fluid supply with the fluid receiver.
 13. A two-way valve including a voting solenoid arrangement adapted to selectively couple a fluid input and a fluid output, said voting solenoid arrangement comprising: first, second, and third solenoid valves each having at least two common ports, a junction port, and first and second other ports; one of said two common ports coupled by a normally open (NO) and a normally closed (NC) fluid passageway, respectively, to said junction port and said first other port; an other of said at least two common ports coupled by a normally open (NO) and a normally closed (NC) fluid passageway, respectively, to said second other port and said junction port; said junction port of said first solenoid valve and one of said other ports of each of said second and third solenoid valves being the fluid input; at least one of said other ports of each of said first, second and third solenoid valves being the fluid output; each of said first, second and third solenoid valves being alternatively actuatable between first and second; and wherein actuation of at least any two of said first, second and third solenoid valves alternately couples and decouples said fluid input with said fluid output.
 14. A two-way valve including a voting solenoid arrangement adapted to selectively couple a fluid input and a fluid output, said voting solenoid arrangement comprising: first, second, and third solenoid valves each having at least two common ports, a junction port, and first and second other ports; one of said two common ports coupled by a normally open (NO) and a normally closed (NC) fluid passageway, respectively, to said junction port and said first other port; an other of said at least two common ports coupled by a normally open (NO) and a normally closed (NC) fluid passageway, respectively, to said second other port and said junction port; said junction port of said first solenoid valve and one of said other ports of each of said second and third solenoid valves being the fluid input; at least one of said other ports of each of said first, second and third solenoid valves being the fluid output; and one of said common ports of said first solenoid valve being coupled to said junction port of said second solenoid valve; and one of said common ports of said second solenoid valve being coupled to one of said other ports of said third solenoid valve. 